Wikipedia defines Ambush marketing as " Marketing strategy wherein the advertisers associate themselves with, and therefore capitalise on, a major sporting event without paying any sponsorship ". I just like to call it screw-you marketing. This type of marketing is usually aimed at underminig the efforts of another sponsor in a really smart and creative manner, for a fraction of their costs.
Ambush Marketing first came into focus in the 1980's. When the Olympics were opened up to corporate sponsorship, because of turmoil in the previous few events, they became one of the biggest targets of the phenomenon with some people predicted that all sponsors would abandon the games if instances of Screw-You marketing were not controlled. As a result, the organisers of the London Olympics earlier this year took extra precautions to protect their official sponsors from the threat of ambush marketing, restraining other companies from mentioning the games in their Ads or campaigns (which earned them the ire of world media ). But no amount of restrictions can hold back a smart marketer. Companies such as Google, Burger King, Pepsi etc used internet and social media effectively to give customers the impression that these companies were associated with the games somehow. You can find the top 5 stunts of this year's olympics here. The phenomenon is brilliantly depicted in this cartoon from Marketoonist about Beat headphones (promoted by American wrapper Dr Dre) which sent out free background-noise-blocking headphones to athletes embossed with their country's flag and became an instant hit among the athletes in London.
Nike completely blindsided, the official games sponsor Adidas with the brilliant "Find your greatness campaign" that features athletes in places around the world that share the name of the host city "London" (Yes, there seem to be plenty of Londons around the world).
Ofcourse, Nike has enough experience in this sort of stuff having already ambushed official sponsors Converse in the 1984 Olympic games and Reebok in 1992 and 1996 (called the ambush of all ambushes).
I dont think that there is much that can be done to restrict screw-you marketing more than what London did this year, but then again any steps on the part of the organisers will only make advertisers come up with even more innovative ways to ambush the official sponsors.









_1024.jpg)

_1024.jpg)